In the run up to the round table are CCP able to release any stats so that we can potentially put out personal experiences in to context?

- How often have various fatigue thresholds been reached in each of the months split by ship type.
- Number of jumps made split by ship type.

There are likely other stats that would be useful which others will think of.

Thanks. I went back and added some more, I'm pretty sure others will pop up too if you give it a few hours :)

Generally these outreach efforts are a follow up. They are follow up to conversations and conclusions already reached by the internal audience (CCP/CSMs) and now validation of findings and discovery of areas of community push-back is done with the 'round table'.

So, if we could cut to the chase - What changes have already been tentatively announced by CCP or suggested by the CSMs?

Obviously wing and a prayer for an actual answer here since it seems every time a CSM talks about changes they start with "I'm under NDA, but my personal feeling is...".


Grabbing popcorn.

I think it might be worth screening the questions to remove the deliberately agenda'd ones. Entering a question that submits the answer itself isn't going to do anything valuable, and will just waste CCP's time.

For my own questions:

The changes have seen a renaissance for the use of Capitals by low-sec groups in low-sec. Does CCP think this is a good thing?

If they plan to increase jump range, (with attendant impacts on low-sec), how do they plan to mitigate this?

Also, Sugar, you tease, sneaking this around :P. <3

This is a great idea, but people can ask a valid question and propose a possible answer at the same time.

Will you also be trawling for potential mechanic's changes from this thread to supplement questions?

The problem comes when people answer their own question, as if it is the only answer.

Still, I think Ammzi has the best question so far.

I'd like to see an answer to "Which issues can CCP currently identify with the existing jump mechanics?"

Here is my question. Has anybody at the CSM and CCP considered the simple idea that jump fatigue is actuality OK as is and does not need any more tweaks?

My question is:

Since the Phoebe changes went live LowSec has become a far more diverse and interesting environment in which to live, will CCP take these positive changes to LowSec into account when considering further changes to Jump Fatigue and Jump Range?